|
|
05-11-2007, 08:53 AM | #1 |
Drives: Corolla Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
|
Why do all low profile tires have to be of high performance design?
Maybe there are some tire experts in here who can help me out with this one. For the life of me, I can't figure out why all low profile tires have to be either H, V,W, or Z speed rated. Why can't tire manufacturers make 50 and lower series tires in an S or T speed rating?
There seems to be quite a few people in this forum who like the looks of the low profile tires, but they hate the fact that 1) they have to pay a higher price to purchase these tires because they are high performance tires and 2) the compound these tires are composed of is so soft they just don't last very long. In fact, if we were to take a poll, I would bet money that more people would rather have these tires available in a high mileage compound than in a high performance compound. At the very least, they should be available in both forms. Is there some ligitimate reason why these tires couldn't be made available in an all-season, 80K mile touring tire? |
05-11-2007, 09:04 AM | #2 |
Insert sarcasm here.
|
I'm guessing that they figure most people buy low profile tires buy them for the performance advantages over regular tires. Less side wall flex, etc. Id imagine they figure is doesn't make a lot of sense to buy a tire that is made of a harder compound and doesn't stick as well if you are worried about side wall flex. I know what you are saying though. It would be nice. Then again.. How can they charge the same price for a Low pro tire that you pay for a HUGE mudder tire. You know it takes a lot more rubber to make those larger tires. It's all a way to make more money.
|
05-11-2007, 09:09 AM | #3 |
Drives: 07 Bayou Blue Liftback Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,121
|
The inherit limitations of the short sidewall design is my guess.
|
05-11-2007, 09:21 AM | #4 |
Drives: Corolla Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
|
Someone else mentioned the sidewall thing in a similar discussion in another forum and said the shorter siewall needs to be stiffer. I guess my counter to that is; isn't the shorter sidewall stiffer than a higher profile tire simply by virtue of being shorter? Why the need to make it even stiffer still? Just seems like overkill to me.
|
05-11-2007, 09:35 AM | #5 | |
Insert sarcasm here.
|
Quote:
Yes it is stiffer because it is shorter, my guess is that they make them thicker for rim/blowout protection. For things such as potholes. I had a 40 series Toyo go flat due to a nail once. I could hardly tell because the sidewalls were so stiff. |
|
05-11-2007, 10:29 AM | #6 | |
Drives: Corolla Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
|
Quote:
No, my guess is (and again, it's just my theory) a T speed rated touring tire in a 40 or 50 series would be just as safe and durable as a Z speed rated tire, but they aren't made available because tire manufacturers would lose money by doing so. For what it's worth, I emailed these questions to a specialist at the Tire Rack and am waiting for a reply. However, I realize that the Tire Rack is a business, and businesses exist to make money, and I'm sure they know they make more profit selling a high performance tire than they do selling a touring tire, so they have a vested interest in promoting what makes them the most money, so there's a good chance the response I get will be slanted. I wish there was a true tire expert I could ask these questions of who doesn't have any alterior motives so I could get the REAL answer on this issue. |
|
05-11-2007, 10:34 AM | #7 |
Drives: 07 yaris Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 106
|
they make all kinds of non performance low profile tires, but then again any tire that lasts more than 20,000 miles really isnt that much of a performance tire to me
__________________
'07 blazing blue hatch-TRD shocks-tanabae df210-TRD rear sway bar-koning feathers 16x7-the basics for now |
05-11-2007, 11:10 AM | #8 |
Drives: Corolla Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
|
|
05-13-2007, 01:01 AM | #9 |
Drives: 07 yaris Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 106
|
i understand what you looking for in a tire, but you misunderstood me, i was just voicing my opinion that i dont think a tire that lasts over 20,000 miles is much of a performance tire at all. its just hard to find that tire that has the best of all worlds, like quiteness,dry weather, wet weather, handling, and longevity i just give up a lot just to have good cornering grip
you could just get a touring style tire and have it streched for the low profile look and still retain some quiteness and longevity. there are still some cons to this method but if you dont drive to aggressive it should work good. it is done in the euro scene alot good luck
__________________
'07 blazing blue hatch-TRD shocks-tanabae df210-TRD rear sway bar-koning feathers 16x7-the basics for now |
05-14-2007, 08:18 PM | #10 |
Drives: Corolla Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
|
|
05-16-2007, 01:23 AM | #11 |
Drives: 07 yaris Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 106
|
why sir you are correct
__________________
'07 blazing blue hatch-TRD shocks-tanabae df210-TRD rear sway bar-koning feathers 16x7-the basics for now |
05-11-2007, 01:38 PM | #12 |
Insert sarcasm here.
|
I agree with your theory complete grampi. That same thing goes for a lot of other businesses as well. Unfortunately, it's kinda the nature of the beast.
|
05-12-2007, 02:05 PM | #13 |
Drives: Yaris 3 Door, 04 WRX, 69 Lotus Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: norcal
Posts: 128
|
T rated winter tires exist in 45% sidewalls
Speed rating has nothing to do with the performance or life of the tire. For example, continental makes a 205/45 - 17 that is V rated, but a base passenger all season tire, with a tread wear of 400. It is $70 less than a Pirelli V rated summer tire that has a tread wear of 180. They are also $20 more than a continental V rated performance all-season with a tread wear of 280. The base tire will last 1.4 times the perfromance all-season for 1.1 times the price, but less grip. To answer the original question, all low profile tires are not high performance design. The Continental ContiProContact SSR is defiantly not high performance. Bridgestone and Pirelli also make winter tires in low profile and those are most definatly not high perform. Almost all cars that come from the factory with low profile tires do not come with high performance tires due to the liability created by the tires not accommodating water or snow. For my WRX, I can find 8 non-performance designed low profile tires. All are V or Z rated, but none are performance design. |
05-14-2007, 08:20 PM | #14 | |
Drives: Corolla Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
|
Quote:
|
|
05-15-2007, 08:42 AM | #15 |
Insert sarcasm here.
|
|
05-15-2007, 11:28 PM | #16 |
Drives: Yaris 3 Door, 04 WRX, 69 Lotus Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: norcal
Posts: 128
|
But the name is misleading ;) Its uniform throughout one manufacturer but not between manufacturers.
A tire from company X with a treadware of 125 might be harder and last longer than a tire from company Y with a treadware of 175. But a Kumho Estca MX with a treadware of 220 will definaly wear out quicker than their Solus KR21 with a treadware of 640 ;) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best all-season tires for the Yaris? | Rahxephon | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 33 | 03-17-2013 06:40 PM |
Do bigger wheels and tires improve performance | Driver | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 14 | 10-14-2006 06:01 PM |