![]() |
|
|
|
#1351 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 3-dr auto RS Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 1,051
|
Sorry Edd, I accidentally deleted my reply to your Post #1351 in the course of editing. When it comes to computers, I am all thumbs. My reply now reappears as Post #1353. Also, I only said "may". I am not absolutely sure that Australian Yari have trip computers showing the cars' fuel consumption. It is very smart of you to ask for confirmation from other members.
Last edited by swng; 07-03-2007 at 08:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1352 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 3-dr auto RS Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 1,051
|
Re: Post #1352.
Sorry Edd! Just visited the websites of Toyota in Australia and Great Britain. Can't find hints about the availability of trip/onboard computers for the Yaris . Probably they are not offered.Here are the sites: http://www.toyota.com.au/yaris/ http://www.toyota.co.uk/cgi-bin/toyo...all&id=YA3_exp May be our knowledgeable members can supply information on this subject. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1353 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 yaris 5-dr le man Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 699
|
just achieved 41 mpg (us) on my latest tank, almost entirely highway driving, probably an average speed of 110 km/h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1354 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 3-dr auto RS Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1355 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 yaris 5-dr le man Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
but like you say, it was essentially normal driving, and a lot of it in heavy traffic (401 holiday weekend traffic) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1356 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2007 Yaris S Join Date: May 2007
Location: Piqua, Ohio
Posts: 302
|
We had a cool couple days and I didn't use the AC much at all and ended up getting my highest combined mileage yet...43.3 MPG!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1357 |
|
Chillin' out by the Bay
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The back streets of San Fran
Posts: 151
|
What's your average mph at cruise speed?
__________________
Gettin' all the way down. Meteorite '07 HB STILL completely stock; but.... checkin' out da other ones to see what's what. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1358 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2007 Yaris S Join Date: May 2007
Location: Piqua, Ohio
Posts: 302
|
I'm not sure because I drive about 40/60 city/hyway. The only time I had used it for a long trip where it was all hyway miles was three months after I bought it and I averaged 40mpg but that was with about 400 pounds of gear thrown in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1359 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2007 Yaris S Join Date: May 2007
Location: Piqua, Ohio
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1360 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 yaris 5-dr le man Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1361 | |
|
Chillin' out by the Bay
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The back streets of San Fran
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
I bought the Yaris for the fuel efficiency as my daily commute car (56 miles roundtrip @65 mph = 39.5 mpg). I wanted the fuel economy and to reduce my carbon footprint. I have a 2001 turbo volvo (S60-T5) as well as my old 1981 Turbo Volvo. The S60 gets 25 on the highway and 21-ish in the commute. The old '81 was getting 20 avergage in the commute but required premium fuel. I didn't want to put the miles on the '01 so enter the Yaris! The cost savings have been tremendous and the conservation is a big plus. In another thread, there was a comment on conservation. It is funny to see a single person in a 2.5 ton SUV commuting to work gettting 13-15 mpg average. I know some of the newer models get closer to 20 but we are getting double that. We will all face the prospect of dwindling resources, and I submit that it feels pretty good doing my part now. That's just my editorial two-cents worth. I still think the car is a blast to drive.
__________________
Gettin' all the way down. Meteorite '07 HB STILL completely stock; but.... checkin' out da other ones to see what's what. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1362 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Yaris LB Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 89
|
This really cracked me up yesterday: I was watching The Goodbye Girl, a 1977 film, and in the film, one of the characters is describing a Subaru, saying that it gets 39 mpg hwy and 29 city! What!? Isn't it remarkable that 30 years ago, cars were getting essentially the same mpg that our Yaris gets now? You would think that in the passage of time that we would have figured out how to put together a car that gets 50+ mpg without having to resort to a hybrid engine. Unbelievable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1363 | |
|
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
Quote:
Welcome to the CAFE debate! Try not to get so pissed off at the AAMA that you feel the need to blow something up.
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1364 | |
|
toyota
Drives: 2007 Yaris RS Blazed Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: toronto, canada
Posts: 3,637
|
engine!!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1365 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 yaris 5-dr le man Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 699
|
i've heard people say that the fuel back then was more effecient and of better quality,
i have no idea if there is any merit to this theory, just throwing it out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1366 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 3-dr auto RS Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 1,051
|
I think Marcus is right that our Yari are way more powerful than the 1977 Subaru, despite that the latter also enjoyed almost equally good fuel economy. In other words, if we compare engines back in circa 1977 with engines of today on an equal power output basis, today's engines should prove a lot better in terms of fuel economy.
In addition, I am not sure but chances are that though the 1977 Subaru enjoyed good fuel economy, it nevertheless did not have an ultra low emission engine and is therefore less environmentally friendly. Also stuffy, though I am not absolutely sure, I believe as you indirectly suggested, fuel back in 1977 could probably produce more mpg, the main reason being the presence of lead content therein, which apart from anything else, like its effect on octane properties, is a lubricant(http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasc...9/gen99615.htm). However, lead is not good for the environment. But that is another story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1367 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2007 Yaris S Join Date: May 2007
Location: Piqua, Ohio
Posts: 302
|
Plus factor in that a 1977 Subaru was, is, and always shall be a cheap piece of shit. LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1368 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2007 Orange Yaris Hb 3Drs Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal-Canada
Posts: 262
|
right, it's all about the engine size and HP because actual cars weight way more than 30 years ago. but despite more powerful engines, nobody makes full use of it since people almost never drive past 4000 rpm. give me a 80 hp Yaris with a more nervous engine - I'll be happier with it
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|