![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Super Moderator
Drives: 2014 White VITZ Join Date: May 2007
Location: Huntington Bch, CA
Posts: 4,938
|
Quote:
For example, OEM alloys are 16x6, ET51, 195/50/16; and 17x6.5, ET51, 205/45/17. I do agree that a narrower tire generally delivers better fuel economy, but there is a significant trade-off in handling and safety. If you're going for maximum fuel economy, then replace your 175's with 155's and high offset flat disc alloy wheels (or just install flat aluminum covers on the stock steel rims). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 07 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
Thanks for the info on the OEM sizes. My next rim is going to be 15x6.5. I did 300,000KM on the 195/50/15 tires mounted to 7 inch wide rims (Toyo Proxes FZ4 and was on my third set when I sold the car). Excellent setup, since the tires were tightly stretched over the rims, it made for immediate turn-in (the thick sizewalls on the Toyo Proxes FZ4 probably played a factor). The suspension system in my Yaris isn't going to be as radical, so 6.5 inch (rim width) should be good fit. If tires are stretched tightly over wide rim, it should return more surface contact vs an overized tires on skinny rims which will simply bulge out on the sides. Imagine identical cars with identical tires on the racetrack (on performance springs). One with 15x5.5 rims vs 15x7 rims (on 195 tires). I bet the differences would be surprising. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Stock 15" RE92 tire | GabL | Items for Sale by private party | 9 | 07-02-2007 02:20 AM |