![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
I've done that. 89 Octane = a loss of 5% MPG, 93 Octane = a 9% loss.
I tried 2 tanks in a row of each to get a more accurate test (and the low numbers hurt my running tank average). Without a doubt I consistently get the highest MPG with 87 Octane. Aside from my much calmer driving style two other things that may make a difference for me are that we're always on 10% Ethanol here and I'm at a higher altitude than most folks (my home is at 4,500ft., my office is a 6,350ft., and I traverse an 8,900ft. summit to get there).
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Yaris Sedan (auto) Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 545
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
Quote:
This helps the lead-footers produce much less emissions, which is a good thing, but by proxy it robs the proper drivers of lots of mileage.
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|