PRM Jetstream Prototype CAI

[Tamago]

Originally Posted by WeeYari

Dyno'd on MUSKOKAs sedan. Printed copy of chart won't scan in worth shit, but will have electronic version sent to me later.

In a nut shell:
- base line stock 97.15 whp/101.77 ft-lbs torque
- with intake 101.12 whp/104.07 ft-lbs torque

Graph shows nice even gains throughout the power curve.

that sounds like a seriously mis-calibrated dyno..

97whp on a STOCK AUTOMATIC 1nzfe that is rated at 106 AT THE CRANK??????? sorry, i call B.S.

edit: read that you had a muffler.. still isn't gonna make up for the 10 or so extra HP you show..

[WeeYari]

Originally Posted by Tamago

that sounds like a seriously mis-calibrated dyno..

97whp on a STOCK AUTOMATIC 1nzfe that is rated at 106 AT THE CRANK??????? sorry, i call B.S.

edit: read that you had a muffler.. still isn't gonna make up for the 10 or so extra HP you show..

First off, I can't speak to the calibration of the dyno, but regardless the difference between the two runs is where the meat lies.

Second, my HB is the automatic and served as the subject car for development. The sedan on the dyno last night is a 5 spd.

[MUSKOKA800]

Originally Posted by Tamago

that sounds like a seriously mis-calibrated dyno..

97whp on a STOCK AUTOMATIC 1nzfe that is rated at 106 AT THE CRANK??????? sorry, i call B.S.

edit: read that you had a muffler.. still isn't gonna make up for the 10 or so extra HP you show..

FYI, it's a 5 speed, not automatic. And interesting because one of the Matrix guys was pissed, claiming his tested much higher on another dyno so???

In any case it's a know fact that no two dyno's will read the same. Different machine, different temps, different air, different operator...
The purpose of these tests were to compare baseline hp and that generated with the Jet Stream Intake installed. The pulls were accomplished within minutes of each other with only the time to switch the intakes between tests.