![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Drives: LB Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OH
Posts: 7,787
|
Betty!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
vroom vroom
Drives: lil red 5-door Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 7,744
|
Oh I already have a bastardised intake...
but, as I mentioned in your thread, the only reason mine is not shorter is because of that breather tube, I did not want to remove that first piece of tubing... But now I might just try it
__________________
The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish. - Robert Jackson ![]() Bye bye 1NZ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
vroom vroom
Drives: lil red 5-door Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 7,744
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_fuel_ratio
Oh well, this explains a lot, looks like it does not only affect forced induction situations, and I guess I'll just shut up now ![]() Now, I wonder if this rich mixture is affected by the actual engine's knock sensor, or if it is a pre-mapped setting... Time to try some higher octane fuel (less chance of knock) next time and see what happens ![]() Quote:
__________________
The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish. - Robert Jackson ![]() Bye bye 1NZ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2007 Yaris Sedan "D" package Join Date: May 2006
Location: Barrie, ontario
Posts: 852
|
wideband afr guage would work on our cars better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Break'em off some.
Drives: 07 Yaris LB, 04 Cobra Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: So Cal, OC
Posts: 854
|
A narrow band AFR guage is useless. Get a wideband for a more accurate picture of what is going on.
Higher octane will not change your AFR. the car will run 14.7:1 in closed loop while putting around, but in WOT situations the car needs more fuel to keep EGTs down. This is a scenario where it is not practical to run the theoretical limit because you will harm the engine. This is typical in ALL cars, and more pronounced in FI applications. Your intake could very well be contributing to this issue. While I wouldn't call just below 12:1 too rich, but it could probably be leaned out a bit safely. Generally intakes make power by leaning the car out a bit, but yours has a tight 180 degree turn right before the MAF that could be throwing things off a bit. Ashley |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Scions Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
This is very true. The stock ECU should have you running somewhere in the 12.5 range at WOT and 14.7 at part throttle. This is what we typically see out of toyota ECUS. The Rich reading on a narrow band ecu is about as useful as that one buddy who always wants to help but breaks the parts he attempts to install. I would put the thing on a dyno with a sniffer and get a better idea. I am not sure that I would be that worried about it if all you have modded is an intake. I am confident the car is safe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
vroom vroom
Drives: lil red 5-door Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 7,744
|
Quote:
![]() I'm not actually sure if my meter is narrowband or wideband, it's an analog one with a range from 10 to 17, or am I barking up the wrong tree? So, this extra cooling capacity is meant mainly as a protection against engine overheating, not knock? Anyway thanks for the input guys, largeorangefont, I never really liked that bend in the tube there, I'll see what I can do about shortening/straightening it, probably have to get one of chinocharles' bouncing bettys or similar
__________________
The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish. - Robert Jackson ![]() Bye bye 1NZ... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|