"5 Driving Myths That Cost You Money"

[PETERPOOP]

http://financiallyfit.yahoo.com/fina...waad=ad0035&nc

Thirty years ago, in the days of buck-a-gallon gas, it's hard to imagine people were giving a second thought to the price at the pump or their driving habits. But today, gas prices are higher than ever and the fluctuations are tremendous. It seems like even the smallest hiccup in the oil and gas sector means immediate rises in the price at the pump. These sudden price jumps quickly cramp your fuel budget, and this is forcing drivers to take drastic tactics to increase their fuel economy and save money on gas. While, in theory, these fuel-saving methods have some merit, in practice, many of these tips are ineffective, unsafe or both. Here are some common fuel-saving myths that will cost you more than you'll ever save at the gas station.

1. Airflow gadgets -- $90+ wasted

The Theory: High-tech devices designed to increase your engine's airflow will improve fuel efficiency.

The Facts: It sounds plausible, but the results don't back up the impressive claims. Consumer Reports tested several of the devices, such as Fuel Genie ($89.95, plus shipping), that purport to increase fuel economy by accelerating airflow to the engine. The tests found no noticeable gains in MPGs, despite claims of 50% fuel savings. While it's true that drastically increasing the airflow to an engine is a common way to increase horsepower (i.e. forced induction through turbo and superchargers), doing so will actually increase fuel consumption and increase wear on the engine, not to mention that this proven technology costs significantly more than its gimmicky competition.

2. Fuel additives -- $5 to $250 wasted (per treatment)

The Theory: The gas we buy can be improved by adding scientifically formulated chemicals that will increase fuel efficiency and, sometimes, horsepower.

The Facts: Clearly, some drivers believe the answer to their fuel woes lies in a magic elixir, because there are numerous fuel treatments that claim to increase MPGs, despite no scientific proof or explanation of how less fuel is burned. According to CNN.com, one common tactic used by shady fuel-additive makers is to tout the product's approval by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This suggests that a trusted consumer watchdog has approved the product's claims, but in fact, the EPA had only deemed that the product does not increase a vehicle's harmful emissions. The truth is, if there were an additive that made fuel burn more efficiently, oil companies would be racing to market their new gas at the pumps and gain a bigger market share.

3. Premium fuel -- $4 wasted per tank (on average)

The Theory: Premium gas provides increased performance and better gas mileage.

The Facts: This is true ... if you own a premium automobile that requires high-octane gas, but these cars make up the minority of daily drivers. So if you're in the majority -- drooling over Ferraris from the seat of your Corolla -- your car's engine control unit (ECU) is programmed to run on the octane levels present in regular gas. Increasing the octane -- either through buying premium gas or adding bottles of octane-boost -- can actually cause the engine to be less efficient, as the car's combustion timing becomes altered and efficiency is lost. But the most noticeable loss will be the extra 20 cents per gallon you'll be wasting to buy high-octane gas. A safe bet is that if you can afford a vehicle that requires only premium fuel, you likely aren't concerned with gas prices or tracking mileage.

4. Over-inflated tires -- $200 wasted (minimum)

The Theory: Rounder tires roll easier, creating less work for the engine and therefore, better MPG.

The Facts: Again, this tip is true ... to a point. Over inflated tires will have less friction with the road, which lessens the effort the engine exerts to keep the car rolling, providing slight gas savings. However, overinflated tires will wear out quickly and irregularly, causing you to need early replacements at a cost of about $50 to $100 per tire. What's worse is that the decreased contact with the road increases stopping distances and limits handling capabilities. This all adds up to a large risk in costly accidents and injuries. Even if you are lucky and avoid a collision, it would take a lifetime (which could very well be short if you're riding on bald and bulbous tires) for your fuel savings to negate the cost of four new tires. According to Edmunds.com's testing, the fuel consumption difference between driving with over-inflated tires and tires at the recommended pressure is negligible. Sometimes, despite what GM's recent track record suggests, carmakers do know what they're doing and the recommended settings and levels do provide the best results.

5. Roll down windows rather than using air conditioning -- comfort wasted

The Theory: Operating the AC to cool the vehicle uses fuel, so it's more efficient to cool off by driving with the windows down.

The Facts: While it's true that some fuel is used to operate the AC compressor, as much or more fuel is lost when the windows are down. Rolling down the windows increases the drag on the car, which causes the car to work harder to maintain its speed. For even better mileage, you can improve your AC's efficiency by using the re-circulation setting on the car's HVAC system instead of forcing the AC to cool the hot air from outside. Heeding this tip will increase your mileage, as well as your comfort.

The Bottom Line

The act of saving gas borders on sport for some thrifty drivers, but extreme measures don't always equal extreme savings. And while some gas-saving methods will offer a few cents per tank in savings, the safety concerns of these methods outweigh any benefits to your bank balance. It's a boring realization, but the real road to fuel savings lies in common-sense approaches like avoiding unnecessary driving and idling, driving the speed limit and performing regular vehicle maintenance. You won't amaze anyone with this practical approach, but it's better than shocking people with useless purchases, a battered car and a wind-swept hairdo.

[roadrunner]

Rounder tires roll easier, creating less work for the engine and therefore, better MPG.
I would change that to harder, not rounder. I have harder, 42 lbs pressure. That increases my MPG. I am certain that it increases my MPG. Also I run on LRR tires.

[malibuguy]

i picked up 3-4mpg by raising my tire pressures

of course i know i lose traction & ride quality, but i know how to drive a car with little traction

[rningonfumes]

I want to note that I extended the life of my stockies.

And lets rephrase "thrifty" to "desperate" as it sounds like the unthoughtful actions of someone who is suddenly hit with a high fuel bill and is looking for a quick fix. Those of us who have driven conservatively know all that already and I don't mean just hypermilers.

Edit: Either way for the tires part. And number 5...I don't use A/C nor do I roll down the windows when I'm alone.

[STC]

I do agree with point #4. But, if you inflate to the high end (max) of your tire brand specs you can achieve just as good mpg gain as if you inflated over 50 or 60 psi. You risk tire blowout at these psi levels and lose your warranty. You also save more tire life too by staying within the tire specs! I usually ride mine at 42-44 psi... the max limit. To gain the most even and best tire life would probably be between 32-36 psi?

Cheers!

[TLyttle]

I concur with STC. I get my best compromise (between FE and traction) at 38psi, after 3 years of running and experimenting. Results also depend on the brand of tires...

[docB]

The worst thing about the over 40 psi inflation pressures is that when something does puncture the tire, you are more likely to have a blow out than a slow leak. Also, the schrader valves used for the valve stems are not designed for that 50-60 psi level. They date back to when side walls had a 32 psi limit. I run 40-42 frt, 35 rear. The rear is light to begin with. This combo helps keep my car more neutral handling without beating up passengers.
doc

[shinlee]

uh...it's been proved time and again that riding with your windows down INCREASES mileage vs. using the a/c.... Hell, I've done this testing myself. Anyone can. Next time you go on a long road trip, and know you'll be stopping 3 or 4 times, start out with the a/c on the WHOLE trip, and calculate that mileage, then fill up and roll the window down, and calculate that whole trip and compare. Almost 6 mpg difference for me

[LittleRed]

My yaris runs much better on 91 octane gas than on 87... it feels like im dragging an anchor behind me when i use 87... it flies on 91 .... when i DONT put fuel system cleaners in it on a regular basis..the torque drops and it starts to vibrate at idle..... you have to clean the carbon on your intake valves and combustion chambers...and clean your injectors out.... Carbon is a by-product of combustion and you have to clean it out for a engine to run efficently..... I put in an Afe short-ram intake and can say it was the best investment i've ever purchased.... i can go up a steep hill in 5th gear and keep the pedal in the same position... it no longer chokes for air... some things are worth the price .... I'll be damned if im going to sweat my ass off in summer to save gas when i get 40+ .. id rather be comfortable... No thanks to that one .... i sacrificed enough not having power windows and door locks.. <never again> i have power and very good fuel economy...what else could i ask for in a $12, 000 car that will run for 400,000 miles ....

Originally Posted by PETERPOOP

http://financiallyfit.yahoo.com/fina...waad=ad0035&nc

Thirty years ago, in the days of buck-a-gallon gas, it's hard to imagine people were giving a second thought to the price at the pump or their driving habits. But today, gas prices are higher than ever and the fluctuations are tremendous. It seems like even the smallest hiccup in the oil and gas sector means immediate rises in the price at the pump. These sudden price jumps quickly cramp your fuel budget, and this is forcing drivers to take drastic tactics to increase their fuel economy and save money on gas. While, in theory, these fuel-saving methods have some merit, in practice, many of these tips are ineffective, unsafe or both. Here are some common fuel-saving myths that will cost you more than you'll ever save at the gas station.

1. Airflow gadgets -- $90+ wasted

The Theory: High-tech devices designed to increase your engine's airflow will improve fuel efficiency.

The Facts: It sounds plausible, but the results don't back up the impressive claims. Consumer Reports tested several of the devices, such as Fuel Genie ($89.95, plus shipping), that purport to increase fuel economy by accelerating airflow to the engine. The tests found no noticeable gains in MPGs, despite claims of 50% fuel savings. While it's true that drastically increasing the airflow to an engine is a common way to increase horsepower (i.e. forced induction through turbo and superchargers), doing so will actually increase fuel consumption and increase wear on the engine, not to mention that this proven technology costs significantly more than its gimmicky competition.

2. Fuel additives -- $5 to $250 wasted (per treatment)

The Theory: The gas we buy can be improved by adding scientifically formulated chemicals that will increase fuel efficiency and, sometimes, horsepower.

The Facts: Clearly, some drivers believe the answer to their fuel woes lies in a magic elixir, because there are numerous fuel treatments that claim to increase MPGs, despite no scientific proof or explanation of how less fuel is burned. According to CNN.com, one common tactic used by shady fuel-additive makers is to tout the product's approval by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This suggests that a trusted consumer watchdog has approved the product's claims, but in fact, the EPA had only deemed that the product does not increase a vehicle's harmful emissions. The truth is, if there were an additive that made fuel burn more efficiently, oil companies would be racing to market their new gas at the pumps and gain a bigger market share.

3. Premium fuel -- $4 wasted per tank (on average)

The Theory: Premium gas provides increased performance and better gas mileage.

The Facts: This is true ... if you own a premium automobile that requires high-octane gas, but these cars make up the minority of daily drivers. So if you're in the majority -- drooling over Ferraris from the seat of your Corolla -- your car's engine control unit (ECU) is programmed to run on the octane levels present in regular gas. Increasing the octane -- either through buying premium gas or adding bottles of octane-boost -- can actually cause the engine to be less efficient, as the car's combustion timing becomes altered and efficiency is lost. But the most noticeable loss will be the extra 20 cents per gallon you'll be wasting to buy high-octane gas. A safe bet is that if you can afford a vehicle that requires only premium fuel, you likely aren't concerned with gas prices or tracking mileage.

4. Over-inflated tires -- $200 wasted (minimum)

The Theory: Rounder tires roll easier, creating less work for the engine and therefore, better MPG.

The Facts: Again, this tip is true ... to a point. Over inflated tires will have less friction with the road, which lessens the effort the engine exerts to keep the car rolling, providing slight gas savings. However, overinflated tires will wear out quickly and irregularly, causing you to need early replacements at a cost of about $50 to $100 per tire. What's worse is that the decreased contact with the road increases stopping distances and limits handling capabilities. This all adds up to a large risk in costly accidents and injuries. Even if you are lucky and avoid a collision, it would take a lifetime (which could very well be short if you're riding on bald and bulbous tires) for your fuel savings to negate the cost of four new tires. According to Edmunds.com's testing, the fuel consumption difference between driving with over-inflated tires and tires at the recommended pressure is negligible. Sometimes, despite what GM's recent track record suggests, carmakers do know what they're doing and the recommended settings and levels do provide the best results.

5. Roll down windows rather than using air conditioning -- comfort wasted

The Theory: Operating the AC to cool the vehicle uses fuel, so it's more efficient to cool off by driving with the windows down.

The Facts: While it's true that some fuel is used to operate the AC compressor, as much or more fuel is lost when the windows are down. Rolling down the windows increases the drag on the car, which causes the car to work harder to maintain its speed. For even better mileage, you can improve your AC's efficiency by using the re-circulation setting on the car's HVAC system instead of forcing the AC to cool the hot air from outside. Heeding this tip will increase your mileage, as well as your comfort.

The Bottom Line

The act of saving gas borders on sport for some thrifty drivers, but extreme measures don't always equal extreme savings. And while some gas-saving methods will offer a few cents per tank in savings, the safety concerns of these methods outweigh any benefits to your bank balance. It's a boring realization, but the real road to fuel savings lies in common-sense approaches like avoiding unnecessary driving and idling, driving the speed limit and performing regular vehicle maintenance. You won't amaze anyone with this practical approach, but it's better than shocking people with useless purchases, a battered car and a wind-swept hairdo.

[malibuguy]

Originally Posted by shinlee

uh...it's been proved time and again that riding with your windows down INCREASES mileage vs. using the a/c.... Hell, I've done this testing myself. Anyone can. Next time you go on a long road trip, and know you'll be stopping 3 or 4 times, start out with the a/c on the WHOLE trip, and calculate that mileage, then fill up and roll the window down, and calculate that whole trip and compare. Almost 6 mpg difference for me

you gotta use the A/C differently...having the windows down even a little bit increases the aerodynamic drag, it makes a complete mess of airflow over the back half of the car

i pulse my A/C use & don't see much of any reduction of fuel mileage unless i leave it cranked the whole time

[why?]

Originally Posted by shinlee

uh...it's been proved time and again that riding with your windows down INCREASES mileage vs. using the a/c.... Hell, I've done this testing myself. Anyone can. Next time you go on a long road trip, and know you'll be stopping 3 or 4 times, start out with the a/c on the WHOLE trip, and calculate that mileage, then fill up and roll the window down, and calculate that whole trip and compare. Almost 6 mpg difference for me

You are right for people that keep the AC on all the time.

The reason this myth started is some smarter than everyone else engineer did the quick calculations on the air drag, and ignored the drag and gas used by the a/c compressor. When you take that out, it looks true.

But as you noted, real life isn't theoretical mathematics.