Garm's AFE intake vs. TRD high flow air filter???? - Page 2 - Toyota Yaris Forums

kngrsll · 07-20-2009, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kioshi

It looks a lot like the Typhoon intake from K&N, but wayyyy cheaper

ironically, i said the same thing about the K&N when it came out... except that i cant stand oiled filters so the AFE is better in my opinion.

1NZYaris1 · 07-20-2009, 08:21 PM

Go The AFE Dry , you won't regret it , i have had mine on for 20,000KM +
and no problems or CEL's what so ever .

cali yaris · 07-20-2009, 08:23 PM

I have the oiled filters in stock, but so far no one has gone for that option. Everyone likes the easy maintenance of the dry filters better.

Sparks Toyota-TRD · 07-21-2009, 09:06 AM

We also off a Fujita intake from us for $155 on our website.

http://www.trdsparks.com/displaypart...&parts_id=2351

Tim

kngrsll · 07-21-2009, 11:11 AM

Most reviews i have read on filter performance fall along these same lines: http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/

so it appears to me, the dry media work best, with the oiled media second, and the foam/stainless filters finishing worst. so that may explain some discrepency in sales.

scape · 07-21-2009, 11:39 AM

Quote:

How is the performance, fuel mileage with each?

I would like to know this as well; with all else stock, I don't expect much of a change, if any; I don't know how anemic the stock air-box was to begin with but I don't think any real gains are going to be seen with a stock setup. Maybe someone has a Dyno to show the direct gains?

ezhacker1 · 07-22-2009, 01:38 PM

i was looking up on some more info between the Pro Dry S and the Pro 5r http://www.dieselmanor.com/afe/afe.asp

so the oiled one (Pro 5R) has more air flow over the Dry S, maybe it would come down to ease of maintenance which would be the dry one, and how the air pollution is around where you live.

cali yaris · 07-22-2009, 02:44 PM

According to aFE, the oiled media has more airflow (as noted above) than dry, and therefore makes a tiny bit more power.

On our cars, with low horsepower to start with, this difference is negligible, so the dry makes more sense (lower maintenance).

ezhacker1 · 07-22-2009, 03:11 PM

really? i assumed given our low horsepower, a number would have a bigger percentage increase over same number on a higher horsepower engine. Either way, i was also thinking that hte one with more airflow would sound better, but then again im on stock exhaust.

scape · 07-22-2009, 03:53 PM

i think the stock airbox might breathe rather efficiently as is, for stock setup. i think to fully use those ram air and such intakes, more modification is needed; but I'm just guessing here

1NZYaris1 · 07-22-2009, 05:05 PM

On a stock set up then why bother putting in the TRD filter setup

.
My engine only has the NST pullies and the AFE intake , and between the
2 , there is a marked differrance in response and fuel economy .
All Positive .

07-20-2009, 08:21 PM	#20
1NZYaris1 View User's Garage Drives: Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New Zealand Posts: 2,566	Go The AFE Dry , you won't regret it , i have had mine on for 20,000KM + and no problems or CEL's what so ever . __________________ http://www.microimageonline.com/forums/index.php

07-20-2009, 08:23 PM	#21
cali yaris ULTIMATE View User's Garage Drives: 07 Yaris Turbo Join Date: May 2007 Location: Canoga Park, CA Posts: 14,859	I have the oiled filters in stock, but so far no one has gone for that option. Everyone likes the easy maintenance of the dry filters better. __________________ Micro Image forums, online store and shop are now closed. It was a great eight year run, but it was time to focus on other things. I'm still selling parts on eBay under micro*image seller ID and customers can still make requests for anything specific.

07-21-2009, 11:11 AM	#23
kngrsll Apexing Egg!! Drives: 07 Toyota Yaris white hatch Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Spartanburg, SC Posts: 872	Most reviews i have read on filter performance fall along these same lines: http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/ so it appears to me, the dry media work best, with the oiled media second, and the foam/stainless filters finishing worst. so that may explain some discrepency in sales. __________________ HighTach Motorsports 2007 Toyota Yaris-ARGH!! Mods: Tokico HTS, 6.6 kg F, 6.1 kg R custom springs, 23 mm RSB, 2-way TRD LSD, 15x7 +25 Team Dynamic wheels, 195/55/15 Dunlop Star Specs, Cobra Suzuka S

07-22-2009, 01:38 PM	#25
ezhacker1 Drives: Decepticon - Ravage Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Francisco Posts: 1,462	i was looking up on some more info between the Pro Dry S and the Pro 5r http://www.dieselmanor.com/afe/afe.asp so the oiled one (Pro 5R) has more air flow over the Dry S, maybe it would come down to ease of maintenance which would be the dry one, and how the air pollution is around where you live. __________________ Check out my Build thread: http://www.yarisworld.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52274

07-22-2009, 02:44 PM	#26
cali yaris ULTIMATE View User's Garage Drives: 07 Yaris Turbo Join Date: May 2007 Location: Canoga Park, CA Posts: 14,859	According to aFE, the oiled media has more airflow (as noted above) than dry, and therefore makes a tiny bit more power. On our cars, with low horsepower to start with, this difference is negligible, so the dry makes more sense (lower maintenance). __________________ Micro Image forums, online store and shop are now closed. It was a great eight year run, but it was time to focus on other things. I'm still selling parts on eBay under micro*image seller ID and customers can still make requests for anything specific.

07-21-2009, 09:06 AM	#22
Sparks Toyota-TRD Drives: Toyota/Scion Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC Posts: 156	We also off a Fujita intake from us for $155 on our website. http://www.trdsparks.com/displaypart...&parts_id=2351 Tim

07-22-2009, 03:11 PM	#27
ezhacker1 Drives: Decepticon - Ravage Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: San Francisco Posts: 1,462	really? i assumed given our low horsepower, a number would have a bigger percentage increase over same number on a higher horsepower engine. Either way, i was also thinking that hte one with more airflow would sound better, but then again im on stock exhaust. __________________ Check out my Build thread: http://www.yarisworld.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52274

07-22-2009, 03:53 PM	#28
scape View User's Garage Drives: 2007 Yaris Hatchback Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Beaufort, South Carolina Posts: 388	i think the stock airbox might breathe rather efficiently as is, for stock setup. i think to fully use those ram air and such intakes, more modification is needed; but I'm just guessing here

07-22-2009, 05:05 PM	#29
1NZYaris1 View User's Garage Drives: Yaris Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New Zealand Posts: 2,566	On a stock set up then why bother putting in the TRD filter setup . My engine only has the NST pullies and the AFE intake , and between the 2 , there is a marked differrance in response and fuel economy . All Positive . __________________ http://www.microimageonline.com/forums/index.php

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
aFe intakes in stock!	cali yaris	Micro Image	66	02-11-2010 04:58 PM
Possible Group Buy.. Racing Seats, Intakes?	TinyGiant	Items for Sale by private party	60	09-11-2009 02:40 PM
TRD High Flow Oil Filters	Jansen	DIY / Maintenance / Service	20	05-25-2009 04:36 PM
TRD Cold Air Intake IN STOCK!!	Sparks Toyota-TRD	Sparks Toyota	2	05-11-2009 04:03 PM
Intake Systems Decision Maker..	Blenjar	Performance Modifications	25	09-15-2007 10:07 PM