![]() |
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 529
|
I had heavy 17's on my echo for a little while (one set of tires worth) and I could tell it in hwy mpg too. It went from 43-44 mpg to 35-37 mpg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '14 GT86, '08 Vitz Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 9,873
|
Quote:
. I solved that by rolling the rear fender lips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Drives: 09 Yaris hatch 5spd Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
|
Wow thanks for all the posts dudes! Think I'm still gonna go with the 17s since most of my drivin is on the highway so even if I do lose a few mpg not too big of a deal. That said wtf is up with toyota not having cruise control be standard on a car that has power everything else? JERKS! Lol. Not a deal breaker though Im lookin at tocomas now. But im rambling. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '14 GT86, '08 Vitz Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 9,873
|
imo, cruise control would use up more gas because it'll constantly alter the throttle position to maintain the speed.
Which Tacoma are you looking at? |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ULTIMATEDrives: 07 Yaris Turbo Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canoga Park, CA
Posts: 14,859
|
^ I agree that pulse and glide works better, BUT with cruise control I drive less aggressively, so that's a good thing.
__________________
Micro Image forums, online store and shop are now closed. It was a great eight year run, but it was time to focus on other things. I'm still selling parts on eBay under micro*image seller ID and customers can still make requests for anything specific. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '14 GT86, '08 Vitz Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 9,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: 09 Yaris hatch 5spd Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
|
Well I was thinkin extended cab 4x4 with V6 at first but now I'm leanin towards reg cab 4x4 with the 4 banger but still not sure. Going used in the 2005-2009 area so payments wont be so bad as new with a nice down payment. Wont be my DD so I plan to supe it up with exhaust n maybe a chip n stuff since I already have a good mileage vehicle. Most work itll see will be hauling my two dogs around and taking out the trash so pretty much itll be a toy lol. Manual transmission as always.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
if u get Taco...stick is great clutch pedal little odd placement ( push in up ) i find. As for engine size i love the six lots of power and really only little worse on gas , i find with the four u gone drive it harder cos its under power for the truck basically u will burn more gas with the four ...lol
i love the four door short box 4x4 stick...for V6 set up as for 4 cyl the only way i would get it is reg cab short box 4x4 , little lift ..light on its feet. Reason i dont drive one....way to much money :( |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '14 GT86, '08 Vitz Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 9,873
|
Quote:
You'll be sacrificing a lot of power/tq by going with the 4-cylinder. Since it's not your DD, I'd get a V6. You'll have 3,000 lbs more towing capacity (6500 vs 3500). mpg are 18/21 and 16/21 respectively, so it's not like you'll be gaining very much gas savings going with the 4-cylinder. However, I don't think you can get a regular cab with a V6 and stick shift, smallest would be the access cab. Of course, this is for the 2014 Tacoma. Of course, the V6 will cost more than the 4-cylinder, but it'll also have a higher resell value down the line. That's just my take. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 09 Yaris hatch 5spd Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 5
|
Yea from what I can tell they didnt make any reg cab V6 Tacomas at all atleast in recent years. Which sucks cuz the access cab isnt big enuff for my 2 big ass dogs to ride back there and I dont like the look of the double cabs so they were gonna be in the back either way. So a reg cab 4x4 with V6 would be perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '14 GT86, '08 Vitz Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 9,873
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chevy Cruze ECO earns an astounding 42 MPG EPA Highway rating! | Kal-El | Off-topic / Other Cars / Everything else Discussions | 26 | 02-05-2011 11:29 AM |
| 3000 mi Summer Trip Log...MPG included! | slothman86 | Fuel Economy Forum | 14 | 07-20-2010 01:15 PM |
| Better MPG in the City vs. Hwy | Loren | Fuel Economy Forum | 21 | 01-29-2010 12:49 PM |
| Anyone from Missouri? MPG problems inside | 4MPG | Fuel Economy Forum | 31 | 12-17-2008 06:48 PM |
| Buddy Club Wheels | BulletProofAuto | Sponsors Classifieds Area | 8 | 10-19-2006 07:55 PM |