In-Channel vs Tape On Vent Visors

[Altitude]

I have in-channel WeatherTechs and no issue with them whatsoever.

[Kaotic Lazagna]

Originally Posted by Pitt Yaris

What about lighter tint? Or can't you have any at all on the front/side windows?

Nope, the technical legal limit in Cali (70%) does not look different from no tint for the front windows, and no limit in the rear. It just prevents the UV from coming in. Plus, I don't want to pay 100 bucks for that.

Originally Posted by kenkyd

you talking about these? i have them and they just slide in channel. and they do not move at all. not at 120, not with windows up or down. i love them

http://www.weathertech.com/store/mvp...tChoiceIds=680

Cool. More for the in-channels

Originally Posted by PHXDEMON

Asshole cops. How dark is your tint that they are ticketing you for it?

Originally Posted by severous01

y dont u show proof of safety inspection...since they must inspect for tint

to answer ur ? my dad's never had a prob w clip-ons for 6 yrs on his truk

Neither times that I got pulled over, the officer never tested the transmission % (but 35% is noticeably dark, but still, they're not following procedure).

Originally Posted by kenkyd

your tints in pics look darker than 70%, which is what PA laws say. i found that info on the internet so it might be wrong

Originally Posted by zuberio

In California, the vehicle code says you need at least 70% light transmission - BUT the California Highway Patrol (CHP) says you can't have ANY tint on your front windows other than what is integral with the window itself (done at factory).

The CHP get to make their own laws on the highways.

Yup, I live in Cali. I hate how the CHP negates all the people who have SUV's and tint all the way around, but the second they see a tuner, they'll pull them over. Racial profiling I say!

Originally Posted by Altitude

I have in-channel WeatherTechs and no issue with them whatsoever.

Cool, good to know.