![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() |
I've been thinking about this question for a few days. My gut reaction was: lighter wheels will make a significant improvement in accelleration and mpg. My calculations show the opposite. Maybe my logic is flawed? Here's what I've got so far.
Consider two cases: 1) Totally stock Yaris from 0-60mph 2) Yaris with lightweight rims from 0-60mph (NOTE: I'm assuming identical tires) The easiest way to compare the two is from an energy standpoint. Rotational Energy of a Wheel = .5*Mw*(Rw^2)*W^2 where: Mw= Mass of the wheel Rw= radius of the wheel W= rotational speed (Radians/second) For Case 1) Mw= 15lbs. I base this on the wheel/tire combo weight of 33 lbs. tirerack.com says the tire weights 18lbs. 33-18=15 Rw = 7.5 inches. 15in diameter / 2 W = 92.15 (RAD/s). @ 60mph 1mile takes 60 sec. for stock tires tirerack.com says 880 rev/mile so 880/60 = 14.6Rev/second *2Pi= Rad/s convert to metric Mw= 6.8kg Rw=.19m Rotational Energy = .5*Mw*(Rw^2)*W^2 = .5*6.8*(.19^2)*92.15^2 =1042 watts = 1kWatt For Case2) Mw=10 lbs. = 4.5kg This seems like a reasonable lightweight 15 inch wheel Rw=7.5 inches = .19m W = 92.15 RAD/s Rotational Energy = .5*Mw*(Rw^2)*W^2 = .5*4.5*(.19^2)*92.15^2 = 690 watts = .69 kWatt 1- (690/1042) = 33% less energy to accellerate the lighter wheel. This sounds like a lot untill you compare it with the total energy of the car @ 60mph. Energy of Yaris = .5*M*(v^2) Where: M=mass of yaris=2200 lbs = 998kg v=velocity=60 mph= 97 km/h Energy of Yaris = .5*998*(97^2) = 4695 kWatts so (Energy of Wheel) / (Energy of Yaris) @ 60mph is 1/4695 = .0002 .000002% of the total energy is insignificant. Did I make a stupid error in my calc? i would have guessed lightweight wheels would make a big difference...but I proved the opposite. someone help? ...show me the error...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() |
Woops, I moved the decimal point the wrong way...it should be .002%...which is still far less than 1%... anyone else see mathmatical errors?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Yaris Hatch /Landrover D2 Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 242
|
Removing weight helps acceleration as it takes less energy to move the mass but beware of diameter too. If you go with a 17 wheel even if its lighter than the stock steel wheel (not many wheels like that) you have moved the mass 3inches further out from the hub (based on 14 wheels) so it will take more enery to turn the wheel. I have 205 50 15 tires on light weight 11lb wheels , the stock steel wheel and tire are still lighter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
That Focus Guy
Drives: 2004 Focus RSVT Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Last edited by CaysE; 07-11-2007 at 03:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Yaris Hatch /Landrover D2 Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 242
|
I did consider the tires in my weight, and yes the shorter sidewall helps, but the mass of a wheels weight is not in the spokes so if you move it 3" further from the hub even thought the tire tread is the same diameter away as the 14wheel, you have added more mass further from the hub over a stock 14" wheel. I have yet to find a 17" wheel tire combo that I can afford that would weight less than the stock 14 wheel and tire combo.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When will the Yaris hit the showrooms at dealers? | Petrolhead | New YARIS Purchase Forum | 181 | 11-28-2011 08:03 AM |
| Feedback on these wheels | BulletProofAuto | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 21 | 06-04-2007 09:09 PM |
| Buddy Club Wheels | BulletProofAuto | Sponsors Classifieds Area | 8 | 10-19-2006 07:55 PM |
| Do bigger wheels and tires improve performance | Driver | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 14 | 10-14-2006 07:01 PM |
| Enkei RZ5 wheels on Liftback | kennywhy | Wheels, Tires and Suspension Forum sponsored by The Tire Rack | 3 | 09-23-2006 05:22 AM |