![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Reality check: Consider that if you manage to stay in DFCO mode for a full hour, you've only saved about 0.2 gallons of fuel (specifically due to DFCO) since the Yaris' engine uses about 0.2 gal/hr at idle. To get a 10% improvement in fuel economy over the course of a tank of gas, you would have to spend over 5.5 extra *hours* in DFCO mode. Do you think that you are managing that much? -Steve Bergman Last edited by sbergman27; 03-09-2010 at 11:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Steals terrorist's lunch
Drives: 2007 Yaris Liftback Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,299
|
Quote:
While what you say may be technically accurate you completely overlook the fact that fuel efficiency techniques bleed into and overlap each other. It is nigh impossible to extricate an intertwined technique from its siblings, so striving towards DFCO usage will invariably lead to more efficient usage of brakes and deceleration and downhill throttle control while simultaneously making the driver more FE-aware in general. If it is easier for folks to understand that whole set of skills simply as DFCO usage please let them be. Please try to look beyond the trees so that you can see the forest. Getting caught up in the minutiae of an easy-to-understand and easy-to-use technique will do no one any good.
__________________
- Brian Share the Road I often carry 2 carpool passengers and mountain bikes or snowboards/skis over a 4,500 foot elevation difference. Click the graphic above to see my detailed mileage logs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 323
|
I believe in accuracy, and in correcting misleading and/or erroneous information. What you discovered is that brakes turn kinetic energy into waste heat and that conserving kinetic energy helps fuel economy. DFCO is a relatively minor enhancement to that.
My clarifications in no way reduce the value of the information you have provided. But having a more accurate grounding in *why* it works will allow people to make more effective use of it. That's not "attitude". It's a simple respect for truth. I believe in calling a spade a spade. -Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Audio Junky
|
Quote:
It's easy to rack up time in DFCO if you were making sure you were coasting in neutral before you heard of DFCO.... The last stick car I had owned was a 86Jeep Cherokee I had in HS. It didn't have DFCO... so I always popped it into neutral when coasting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Yaris Sedan Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
Regarding relative fuel use between normal idle and 65 mph in neutral, the Yaris uses about 20% less fuel in neutral. Normal idle uses 0.20 GPH, whereas coasting neutral uses 0.16 GPH. So in 2 minutes of DFCO, you are saving a whopping 0.0053 gal (1/187th gal) of gasoline compared to coasting in neutral. Which is about 1/2100th of a tank. Keeping in mind, of course, that it takes longer to get down the hill with the transmission in gear due to that fact that the engine braking slows you down. So the actual savings would be less than that. -Steve |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| low gas mileage? | yrsdrgn | General Yaris / Vitz Discussion | 30 | 01-17-2019 03:26 AM |
| Synthetic oil MPG boost since change | Yaris Dick | General Yaris / Vitz Discussion | 29 | 09-15-2007 08:15 PM |
| Increased MPG or HP anyone???? | slvryaris | Performance Modifications | 55 | 05-27-2007 10:49 AM |
| MPG trackers | acrbill | General Yaris / Vitz Discussion | 11 | 01-01-2007 07:34 PM |