Quote:
Originally Posted by tk-421
By that reasoning, corrupt generals with a long history of war crimes that happened years ago should be freed (or at least not prosecuted) on the basis of their crime's longevity. Doesn't make much sense to me.  |
If you're comparing war crimes to Polanski's case, then I'm the one who's confused.
Ask yourself who would benefit if Polanski was tried again? The victim? Not really. She's made it known that she isn't really interested in reliving all that and exposing the whole sordid story to a new generation of people. So tell me if she doesn't care, what's the point of going through this anyway?
Put your pitchforks away, people. Game over.
07-13-2010, 02:12 AM
Hybrid Mode
