![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 Polar White 5dr, 13 Soul 4u Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,809
|
Quote:
All I can say is, with my mpg logged with each and every one of 297 consecutive fill-ups since I took ownership of my car, the instances where ethanol free were used did not differ from fuel with ethanol added. Power should only be 'necessary' during take-off and hill climbing. Once the vehicle is rolling, you essentially only need enough to maintain momentum. At this point, the lower power in ethanol gas would be negligable in its impact on f/e.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 06 Yaris HB CE Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 501
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2020 Corolla Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 Toyota Echo Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brampton, ON
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
When ethanol is substituted into the fuel, it reduces the amount of energy in the fuel - so there's less energy in the fuel. That translates into less energy per unit volume in the fuel and less overall energy in the entire tank of gas. You *should* see a difference in gas consumption. I know I drop down from ~500km per tank (40L fillup) to ~450km per tank once winter fuel starts getting supplied at the pumps.
__________________
2006 Saturn Ion Redline 2005 Toyota Echo RS 4dr hatch - Cyl #3 bad - sold 2000 Toyota Echo 2dr coupe - The track car - rusty & scrapped |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|